![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I've been in fandom a while, right? Fourteen years and counting. (And all of it online. Jesus.) I know I'm kind of set in my ways; I'm very reluctant and slow to try new fandoms, or pairings, much less new authors. That's one of the reasons I volunteered to do the RPS post for
crack_impala, to occasionally force me out of my comfort zone and make me try new authors. (Though, I have to ask: doesn't anyone post finished stories anymore? I swear 90% of all stories these days seem to be part x/??. But I digress.)
Where was I? Oh, yeah. Reluctant to try new authors. I'm doing better about it, most of the time. But I can guarantee a sure-fire way to ensure I don't ever read your story:
Rating: NC17
Pairing: S/D, D/OFC
Warnings: OOC, AU, PWP
Disclaimer: Don't own, am not making any money so pls don't sue!
A/N: I played fast and loose with our boys. It’s not really meant to follow a particular story line, so you will find that practically this whole thing is OOC. And as just joined the Wincest ranks, I took what I liked and ran with it. My first SPN ficlet so pls be gentle.
Don't be lazy. The names are not that long. Spelling out "Sam/Dean" is a whole extra five characters' worth of typing.
Don't tell me it's "OOC". If you're writing something you consider to be "out of character", you're not writing Sam and Dean (or whatever fandom characters are involved)... so why would I want to read it?
If you can't manage decent grammar (not to mention spelling) in the header, why should I assume you've managed it in the body of your story?
This story could well be an incredibly awesome story, but it's not going to get read (by me certainly; probably by a bunch of others as well, because I know I'm not the only one this annoys). Why? Because you, as the author, have given me no reason to want to read it, and a lot of reasons to NOT want to read it. I know this is supposed to be fun and a hobby and all the rest, but for heaven's sake, have a little pride in what you're posting. Make an effort to make people want to read what you've written. Otherwise, why bother posting it publicly at all?
This post brought to you courtesy of too much benedryl, not nearly enough breath or sleep, and a terminal case of the crankies. Also, someday? I promise to post something fun and happy and cheerful again. I swear. I hate being all *grump grump grump*.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Where was I? Oh, yeah. Reluctant to try new authors. I'm doing better about it, most of the time. But I can guarantee a sure-fire way to ensure I don't ever read your story:
Rating: NC17
Pairing: S/D, D/OFC
Warnings: OOC, AU, PWP
Disclaimer: Don't own, am not making any money so pls don't sue!
A/N: I played fast and loose with our boys. It’s not really meant to follow a particular story line, so you will find that practically this whole thing is OOC. And as just joined the Wincest ranks, I took what I liked and ran with it. My first SPN ficlet so pls be gentle.
Don't be lazy. The names are not that long. Spelling out "Sam/Dean" is a whole extra five characters' worth of typing.
Don't tell me it's "OOC". If you're writing something you consider to be "out of character", you're not writing Sam and Dean (or whatever fandom characters are involved)... so why would I want to read it?
If you can't manage decent grammar (not to mention spelling) in the header, why should I assume you've managed it in the body of your story?
This story could well be an incredibly awesome story, but it's not going to get read (by me certainly; probably by a bunch of others as well, because I know I'm not the only one this annoys). Why? Because you, as the author, have given me no reason to want to read it, and a lot of reasons to NOT want to read it. I know this is supposed to be fun and a hobby and all the rest, but for heaven's sake, have a little pride in what you're posting. Make an effort to make people want to read what you've written. Otherwise, why bother posting it publicly at all?
This post brought to you courtesy of too much benedryl, not nearly enough breath or sleep, and a terminal case of the crankies. Also, someday? I promise to post something fun and happy and cheerful again. I swear. I hate being all *grump grump grump*.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:11 am (UTC)There was a story I came across tonight. ONLY reason I saw any of it was that it wasn't cut (ACK). It was horrid - no punctuation. ill instead of I'll - shit like that. They actually used pls in the story.
Just. No.
(edited because my keyboard is sticking on me at random and I had to fix something)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:18 am (UTC)*jaw drops* Seriously? Oi.
Now occasionally? I'll abbreviate something in a regular post (I do 'obvs' mostly, dunno why). But not in a fiction post.
I blame texting, partially, for some of this. And 'netspeak'. But pretty much everything comes with a spellcheck these days -- I have five little red squiggles in this comment! Geez.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:39 am (UTC)That's really my main issue here. Well, that and a terminal case of the grumpies, which hopefully will go away very soon. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:41 am (UTC)That said, when I was first starting out in a fandom I probably made fic headers like that. *L* I learned pretty damn quick... XD
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:45 am (UTC)I dunno, I just--that header really rubbed me wrong. I think it was the combination of the 'OOC', plus the 'pls' and abbreviating the pairing names (seriously, five extra characters, good grief). Any one of those, I'd have just sailed on past without really even blinking. But all of them together? Plus being grumpy? Not a good combo.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:46 am (UTC)abbreviating character names drives me nuts. that and smooshed pairings. DNW DNW DNW. D:
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:49 am (UTC)We shall be cranky together! :)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:51 am (UTC)(Dastiel/Destiel makes me want to reach through my computer screen and punch people.)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:56 am (UTC)Even so. *shudders*
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 04:50 am (UTC)So that part doesn't bother me. (In fact, it took me a while to *not* put S/D when posting about them.) I think it is probably more bothersome in this fandom because of things like D/S (Dean/Sam) being confused with D/s (Dom/sub)? Or am I wrong on that? Also J/J is kinda stupid, plus it could be Jensen, Jared, Jim and Jeffrey....
But the rest? Yeah, totally with you on that. I'll be very honest and say that 90% of the time I do not read the author's notes. Usually I only read them if a. there seems to be something important in them like a link, maybe to a pic or something, or after I have read the fic and want to know more details. I found myself being put off by comments like this or 'I had a few minutes and chugged this out' or, as dine said, "this wasn't beta'd" because it puts me in the 'this might be crap' mood before I even start reading.
(And am now feeling all shifty cuz I'm hoping *I* didn't rec something with that bad of an introduction (or whatever its called.)*biteslip*
This kinda makes me wonder if that bothers authors if people don't read the notes? You're an amazing author and love every story you write but I still might not read the 'introduction' details. From your perspective, does that matter?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:56 pm (UTC)I think that's one of those conventions that varies from fandom to fandom. You don't get much more old-skool slash than Original Trek, and they use single letters pretty commonly (K/S). Same with Blakes' 7. I was a little confused by that when I moved from Blakes to popslash, but I pretty quickly realised that using just initials really wouldn't work in another fandom where everyone's a J. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:43 pm (UTC)*snicker* Yes. Quite.
Which is a reason it wouldn't work in CWRPS either, since three of the guys often written about... are Js ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:41 pm (UTC)For myself, personally? I try to keep headers/notes to a minimum--because I know not everyone does (or wants to) read them. I also try to keep them simple and readable, because they can get weird quickly. Too many acronyms in that one up above, for sure.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 04:55 am (UTC)I kept feeling guilty because I keep getting annoyed at 'Samifer'. I also am not a fan of the 'Samulet'. *cringes* I'm sorry. I know some people think its cute and I mean no disrespect.
Oddly enough, I am not annoyed at 'Pada-' stuff. I kinda like Padahugs, Padacock, Padapaws, and Padalocks. (Possibly because I would love to have some Padahugs, would pay handsomely to see the Padacock, have an obsession with wanting to watch the Padapaws touch Jensen's face and could spend hours sniffing and rubbing the Padalocks. But I digress...) But why in the world this doesn't bother me and the other does, I haven't a clue!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:45 pm (UTC)The Pada- stuff... eh. I find "Padacock" amusing. The rest, I'm not sure I've even seen those. Thankfully, I think *g* (However, the icon I'm using here is keyword: Padabelly ;))
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:51 am (UTC)As far as I'm concerned, stating (in the warnings, no less!) that your story is OOC is the same thing as admitting to ignoring characterization, so, yeah. Thanks, but I'll pass.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 02:53 am (UTC)That said, I wouldn't read a story with a header like that either, unless it had one of my rarely found but bullet proof kinks.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:00 am (UTC)But I'm still not sure I could/would read it, even if it had one of my bullet proof kinks in it. *g*
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:10 am (UTC)It's okay; I know a bunch of people who do that ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:25 am (UTC)Ditto. Sort of like someone at a cocktail party who wants to move from the fringes of a conversation to fully participating in it.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 08:25 pm (UTC)The thing is, as a social gambit it works! A fairly large percentage of my flist are people that decided to interact with me because at one point they liked something I wrote.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 08:43 pm (UTC)Ditto. In fact, for me, I'm kind of all about the audience component (even if it's just an audience of 1 other person), which kind of dampens my enthusiasm for tackling my original fic ideas. *g*
The thing is, as a social gambit it works! A fairly large percentage of my flist are people that decided to interact with me because at one point they liked something I wrote.
Exactly! :-)
At this point I can't remember if I even got the first fic I ever wrote betaed before I posted it to a list. I might not have, like the author
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:25 am (UTC)As for WIPs, yeah there are so many I forget which ones I'm reading. I think I wouldn't mind so much if the chapters were more substantial than 500 words a pop. You know what I mean? (Says the person with two as yet unfinished WIPs)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:52 pm (UTC)The WIPs are particularly annoying when trying to come up with recs for the C_I post. And 500 words is NOT a chapter. It's a ficlet. Barely.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:31 pm (UTC)Yeah, I saw this same header (last night, maybe?) and all I thought was... NO. Most everything about it just screams... NO.
I'm glad you feel the same way!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 07:56 pm (UTC)I also have a pet peeve with the OOC labeling. If you know it's OOC, why not work on revising it so that it's less OOC? =/
no subject
Date: 2010-05-28 02:20 am (UTC)also yeah, i'm not into things that aren't finished. once upon a time i wrote like that, and it's dangerous. unless you have a definite ending in mind, i don't want to see your part 17 out of whatever.
now i just need a lawn so i can yell at kids to get off it.