and now for a GREAT BIG WOOOHOO!
May. 15th, 2008 01:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
By way of
aproposofnothin and
fishbaum:
Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union "between a man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.
Emphasis from Glace, but as she said, that seems pretty fucking unequivocal.
Gay marriage? LEGAL IN CALIFORNIA!!!! \0/
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union "between a man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.
Emphasis from Glace, but as she said, that seems pretty fucking unequivocal.
Gay marriage? LEGAL IN CALIFORNIA!!!! \0/
no subject
Date: 2008-05-15 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-15 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-15 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-15 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-16 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-16 05:40 am (UTC)