![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
and now for a GREAT BIG WOOOHOO!
May. 15th, 2008 01:53 pmBy way of ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
aproposofnothin and fishbaum:
Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union "between a man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.
Emphasis from Glace, but as she said, that seems pretty fucking unequivocal.
Gay marriage? LEGAL IN CALIFORNIA!!!! \0/
aproposofnothin and fishbaum:Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a union "between a man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be understood as making the designation of marriage available both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.
Emphasis from Glace, but as she said, that seems pretty fucking unequivocal.
Gay marriage? LEGAL IN CALIFORNIA!!!! \0/
