By way of
cereta:
Robert P. George's latest and "greatest" argument against same-sex marriage:
I'm stealing
cereta's summary because it's just that perfect:
Dear Mr. George:
On behalf of couples who have struggled with infertility, adoptees, and rational human beings everywhere: fuck you, fuck you, and did I mention, fuck you.
No love,
Me
PS I think there are some childfree couples over here who'd like a word with you.
I guess I should go tell my mom and stepdad that their marriage isn't a true marriage, yeah? *shakes head*
Robert P. George's latest and "greatest" argument against same-sex marriage:
George and his co-authors continue, however, to observe that not all sexual activity counts as a basis for marriage—what is required is sexual activity capable of producing a child. The article infers this requirement from the physical makeup of men and women. Because same-sex couples cannot create this child-producing combination by themselves, their relationship is a recreational activity more like tennis than like marriage.
But mark the sequel—if a prerequisite of marriage is procreative capacity, then are the marriages of infertile opposite-sex couples not called into question? George and his co-authors are quick to reassure with another sports analogy: "A baseball team has its characteristic structure largely because of its orientation to winning games; it involves developing and sharing one's athletic skills in the way best suited for honorably winning. … But such development and sharing are possible and inherently valuable for teammates even when they lose their games." In other words, infertile couples are still playing ball, even if they never win a game. They are the Phillies, except that they have no hope of ever improving.
I suspect it will be cold comfort to many infertile opposite-sex couples to hear that while their marriage is still "real," it is a "losing" marriage as opposed to a "winning" one. Ideally, most of them view their marriages as something more than honorable defeats and would despise the contention that they had not fulfilled the central purpose the institution. Moreover, the article says nothing of straight people who choose not to procreate. It is unclear why they would have "true marriages," as they are not even trying to win.
I'm stealing
Dear Mr. George:
On behalf of couples who have struggled with infertility, adoptees, and rational human beings everywhere: fuck you, fuck you, and did I mention, fuck you.
No love,
Me
PS I think there are some childfree couples over here who'd like a word with you.
I guess I should go tell my mom and stepdad that their marriage isn't a true marriage, yeah? *shakes head*
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:36 pm (UTC)Huh. I guess that means the Duggars are the only 'true' marriage?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:41 pm (UTC)It might be because I'm all the way over here on the planet with the rational people.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 05:09 pm (UTC)Also, so once you're past child bearing age you should divorce because you can no longer play the game? WTF? His logic is not Logic at all.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 05:18 pm (UTC)Not to mention, continuing the metaphor, if marriage/procreation is some kind of competition, then what do couples get if they win, a set of steak knives?
How do they decide who wins? The couples with all the kids (e.g. the quiverful people)? Are the folks with 'only' one kid not even in the running, because hey, only one kid, you slackers!
What about the same sex couples who have kids by previous 'acceptable' m/f relationships? Do those kids cease to count when computing 'points' because one of their parents is now in a same sex partnership? Can couples from outside the US compete or is this a US-only competition?
Inquiring minds want to know! I love a good sporting event, I wanna know where to place my bets!
/sarcasm
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 06:02 pm (UTC)That said, someone who compares something as complex as human relations to a baseball team doesn't actually deserve the pain in my knuckles.
I'm glad you called attention to this though, I sometimes forget the level of idiocy in the world and how one should never stop fighting it.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 06:28 pm (UTC)I, meanwhile, am a loser who would rather read a book than have anything to do with sports. :P
The anti-same-sex-marriage arguments get more and more ridiculous every day. They must know they're scraping the barrel by this time.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 07:14 pm (UTC)The sad thing is, with the level of scientific ignorance most of these dudes have related to Creationism and global warming, gay people would probably do best using Milk's argument: We can't have babies, but that sure doesn't stop us from trying!
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:17 pm (UTC)But I'm not surprised that this man's claims can conceivably offend *everybody.* ;-)
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:34 pm (UTC)Marriage is not the holy grail, Mr. George, and I'm pretty sure there are very few non-hetero (and even hetero) couples who would want to fit into your narrowminded, pretentious and xenophobic definition of marriage. I sure as hell wouldn't. And please give my condoleances to your 15 year old daughter -- I hope she will have the strenght of mind and guts to make her own decisions in life, love and family planning rather than being dominated by you.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-15 01:57 am (UTC)As someone struggling with infertility, way to kick us while we're down you piece of fucking shit.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-15 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-15 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-16 09:01 pm (UTC)