By way of
cereta:
Robert P. George's latest and "greatest" argument against same-sex marriage:
I'm stealing
cereta's summary because it's just that perfect:
Dear Mr. George:
On behalf of couples who have struggled with infertility, adoptees, and rational human beings everywhere: fuck you, fuck you, and did I mention, fuck you.
No love,
Me
PS I think there are some childfree couples over here who'd like a word with you.
I guess I should go tell my mom and stepdad that their marriage isn't a true marriage, yeah? *shakes head*
Robert P. George's latest and "greatest" argument against same-sex marriage:
George and his co-authors continue, however, to observe that not all sexual activity counts as a basis for marriage—what is required is sexual activity capable of producing a child. The article infers this requirement from the physical makeup of men and women. Because same-sex couples cannot create this child-producing combination by themselves, their relationship is a recreational activity more like tennis than like marriage.
But mark the sequel—if a prerequisite of marriage is procreative capacity, then are the marriages of infertile opposite-sex couples not called into question? George and his co-authors are quick to reassure with another sports analogy: "A baseball team has its characteristic structure largely because of its orientation to winning games; it involves developing and sharing one's athletic skills in the way best suited for honorably winning. … But such development and sharing are possible and inherently valuable for teammates even when they lose their games." In other words, infertile couples are still playing ball, even if they never win a game. They are the Phillies, except that they have no hope of ever improving.
I suspect it will be cold comfort to many infertile opposite-sex couples to hear that while their marriage is still "real," it is a "losing" marriage as opposed to a "winning" one. Ideally, most of them view their marriages as something more than honorable defeats and would despise the contention that they had not fulfilled the central purpose the institution. Moreover, the article says nothing of straight people who choose not to procreate. It is unclear why they would have "true marriages," as they are not even trying to win.
I'm stealing
Dear Mr. George:
On behalf of couples who have struggled with infertility, adoptees, and rational human beings everywhere: fuck you, fuck you, and did I mention, fuck you.
No love,
Me
PS I think there are some childfree couples over here who'd like a word with you.
I guess I should go tell my mom and stepdad that their marriage isn't a true marriage, yeah? *shakes head*