things that rate high on the WTF scale:
Mar. 21st, 2010 10:44 pm600-pound New Jersey mom wants to be world's heaviest woman.
She is ON PURPOSE trying to gain weight to get to 1000lbs. ON PURPOSE!
She spends $750/week on food, not including fast food jaunts to McDonalds, etc. She funds her grocery bill by running a website where men "pay money to watch her consume large quantities of food."
It's just...really depressing, and kind of sickening, actually. I know there are people out there who need to gain weight, but wanting to do it just so you can get the world record? I really do not understand that. At all.
She is ON PURPOSE trying to gain weight to get to 1000lbs. ON PURPOSE!
She spends $750/week on food, not including fast food jaunts to McDonalds, etc. She funds her grocery bill by running a website where men "pay money to watch her consume large quantities of food."
It's just...really depressing, and kind of sickening, actually. I know there are people out there who need to gain weight, but wanting to do it just so you can get the world record? I really do not understand that. At all.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:05 am (UTC)Seriously? This is just... disturbing. BEYOND disturbing.... so she wants to be able to NOT do anything for herself? To not be able to get out of bed and do wear a diaper? Or at least that's how the "ton" documentaries about people weighing close to a ton or more tended to describe them.
Not to mention the health complications... if she doesn't already have a shit ton of 'em.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:07 am (UTC)NOT excusing it, just trying to figure out why she'd be so crazy about it.
...I don't even want to touch that. :^(
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:20 am (UTC)But yeah, that thing with the website? BEYOND disturbing. *shudder*
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:21 am (UTC)I really, really don't get some people :(
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:24 am (UTC)I don't even.
I'm 260lbs and not looking to actively lose weight (if it comes in the course of normal exercise and eating, so be it), but the thought of eating that much food in a day makes me want to vomit this instant.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:35 am (UTC)SEVENTY pieces of sushi in one sitting? I...my mind boggles. I truly cannot imagine that. SEVENTY. I'm just...yeah.
That article looks like it was lifted straight out of MAD Magazine. I can't believe there's someone out there who's actively trying to gain 400 more pounds. 400 pounds! That's the equivalent of two grown men! Two *big* grown men!!! The mind boggles.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:32 am (UTC)Also, spending $3000 on food a month? It boggles my mind.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:44 am (UTC)I truly don't understand why she would want a recognition like that. It's going to be cold comfort to her family when she suffocates under her own weight, while sleeping. Or strokes out, or has a heart attack, or a zillion other things that could happen.
My monthly budget for my household -- ALL bills, plus food, gas, etc. isn't $3K. I just can't wrap my mind around that figure, either. (Honestly, I thought $75-100/week was a lot on groceries for just me and Matthew, but it does cost more to eat healthier, so who knows. Apparently it also costs a lot to, well, eat a lot. o_O)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:45 am (UTC)The boyfriend's obviously a fucking psychopath. Couldn't 750 a week be going into her daughter's college fund or something?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:50 am (UTC)and we wonder why I say life is one giant badfic.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:55 am (UTC)I think the $750 a week should be going into a fund to support her daughter, when the woman dies of a stroke, or heart attack, or suffocates herself if she rolls over and can't breathe. If it's a stroke or heart attack, you know she'd likely be dead before emergency personnel could *get her out of the house*, never mind get her to a facility that could care for her.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:57 am (UTC)But this? Wanting to be the world's heaviest woman? Who the hell wakes up one day and thinks that?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 06:46 am (UTC)I mean, I will fully admit that I generally think we get WAY too fixated on "healthy weight" and all that stuff but the whole 'feeding up' as a sexual thing kind of freaks me out. I try not to judge other people's kinks but, well. Ew. (To be fair, I feel that way about any kind of encouragement of body modification as part of a relationship. Like, if someone likes tattoos, and wants to get one to commemorate someone, then fine, whatever. But you shouldn't push someone to GET a tattoo for you, you know? People shouldn't be guilted or emotionally manipulated into changing their bodies.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 07:55 am (UTC)I completely agree on the body modification--whatever that modification is from piercing, tattooing, scarring/branding, plastic surgery--anything should be because the individual receiving it wants it for themselves. They shouldn't want to change their body for someone else (say breast implants for their spouse even).
We do put a lot of emphasis on weight... but, at least in the US, I do think that (especially for the younger generations in like elementary-HS ages) weight should be looked at for health reasons as new studies are showing growing rates of weight related health issues (diabetes for ex.) that could lead to this next generation having a shorter life span than those that are even in our 20s right now. I'm not saying that everyone should be like 110 lbs or anything (that's kinda disturbing for many heights, actually)... but it should be something that isn't ignored.
'healthy weight' depends on the individual, some people can be perfectly healthy weighing more while others get health problems. My Dad developed diabetes while my Mother, who is still overweight, hasn't developed it. Hell... those stick thin models are often worse off than people termed 'overweight'.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 01:35 pm (UTC)(Non-weight-loss just meaning stuff where weight loss is not the primary goal, like it is in diets or weight loss surgery.)
Plus, I don't think we adequately understand what role repeated dieting plays in the development of what we consider to be 'weight related' issues - the vast majority of people who are overweight[1], obese, or morbidly obese in the US have PROBABLY been on at least some form of diet plan previously, and many of them have been struggling with dieting for years and gaining and losing weight. We KNOW that's hard on the body and messes with all kinds of things, so I'm not entirely convinced that we may not be making things worse when we encourage people who aren't 'normal' weight to go on diets even if their other health markers are perfectly fine and their activity levels are good.
There's some other stuff, too, to do with 'genetics' - it's not strictly genetics in the sense of a 'fat gene' but apparently there's something to do with the living conditions of your grandparents and that has an effect on you through some non-DNA thing. I forget what it's called. (Sorry, I'm sick, my brain is a bit splat and my dad told me about this particular study a while back.) So that's another complicating factor that may be influencing things more than any of the things we consider more obvious 'causes' of weight problems, like soda or fast food. (Although I am totally in favor of less high fructose corn syrup. If only because that stuff makes my arthritis flare like MAD and I'm tired of having to examine ingredient labels. :) )
[1]- I have a whole separate rant about BMI and how it's totally useless for medical purposes and how they redefined the categories a while back, thus suddenly making a whole raft of people who were 'normal' weight 'overweight' and 'overweight' 'obese', and how it is ridiculous when you try to apply it to anyone with a fair amount of muscle mass. (Not just body builders, mind you, but even just some 'normal' people who are relatively active and tend towards having more muscle. Like my dad's family all tend towards just being well-built - muscle, not fat - whereas my mom's side has to work at it forever to really have decent muscle mass.) (I take after my dad - when I was ~8 I had defined muscles in my arms and legs just from general levels of kid running around; I wasn't a competitive sport player or anything like that.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:26 pm (UTC)When asked about how they'd go blind, get kidney failure, heart attacks, nerve damage to their limbs, etc because of this they did not care so long as they were not fat.
Aside from these long-term effects, high blood sugar feels awful as I know from personal experience.
Like when I read your post, at first I tried to rationalize and figure out why people would want to do that but you know? People are just crazy, they can have a million reasons and it still isn't justifiable.